Israel Plans Shift from US Aid to Strategic Investment Partnership

In a bold move to redefine its relationship with the United States, Israel is preparing to phase out traditional foreign aid and instead embrace a new strategic model centered around joint investments and innovation. The effort, spearheaded by Likud MK Amit Halevi, seeks to move Israel from dependency to partnership replacing aid with mutual benefit and sovereign control.

“Israel must first and foremost be a sovereign state that respects its sovereignty,” said Halevi, who chairs the Knesset subcommittee on National Security Doctrine. “We are not a welfare state. We are a nation of innovators, allies, and equals.”

Under the current Memorandum of Understanding (MOU), Israel receives $3.8 billion annually from the U.S., most of which must be spent within the American defense industry. Critics argue this model no longer reflects Israel’s capabilities or contributions, and that it limits Israel’s defense flexibility and industrial development.

Halevi envisions replacing this approach with scaled-up versions of joint ventures like the BIRD and BSF Foundations binational programs that promote co-developed industrial and scientific innovation. The shift, he argues, would better serve both nations by emphasizing reciprocity, autonomy, and strategic alignment.

“Too often, Israeli officials thank America for its generosity,” noted Yoram Ettinger, former Israeli ambassador. “They should remind Congress this is a win-win. Every dollar spent on Israel generates immense value in U.S. military research and readiness. Israel is a battlefield laboratory, a luxury showroom for American defense systems.”

This perspective is supported by Israeli defense research expert Dr. Raphael BenLevi, who warned that past U.S. aid packages have influenced critical political decisions sometimes at the expense of Israeli sovereignty. He also noted that reliance on U.S.-based procurement has weakened Israel’s domestic manufacturing capabilities, a vulnerability made clear during the munitions shortages following the October 7 war.

BenLevi and Halevi propose a ten-year phased transition ending in 2028 when the current MOU expires. The goal is not to sever ties with Washington, but to mature the alliance and unlock new forms of strategic cooperation unrestricted by rigid aid frameworks.

Some lawmakers and experts remain cautious. Opposition MK Moshe Tur-Paz argued that U.S. aid surges to as much as 16% of Israel’s defense budget during wartime. Yet BenLevi counters that the aid currently amounts to just 0.7% of Israel’s GDP a manageable figure for a thriving nation capable of self-investment.

The shift is also politically strategic. Many in Washington, particularly among conservative ranks, view unconditional aid with skepticism. Recasting Israel as a high-return investment rather than a foreign aid recipient could strengthen bipartisan support and quiet critics.

“U.S. assistance to Israel is not a one-way street,” said Marc Zell, chairman of Republicans Overseas Israel. “It’s an investment. This shift in messaging can neutralize criticism on the right and highlight how this alliance serves American interests.”

Even U.S. Ambassador Mike Huckabee echoed the sentiment recently “America benefits greatly from its relationship with Israel… From intelligence and military tech to life-saving medical innovations, what we get is invaluable.”

As the MOU nears its expiration, Halevi is drafting a formal policy roadmap to prepare Israel for a new era of partnership rooted not in aid, but in strength, strategy, and shared purpose.

Support Israel’s forward momentum share this article and subscribe to our newsletter for more insights into Israel’s strategic future.